01How do you ensure the quality of every engagement?+
Quality is checked at three points, not one:
• Mentor selection, every mentor is screened against your specific brief before assignment. Not all mentors in the network are right for every engagement.
• In-cycle review, at each Outline → Draft → Final milestone, our Editorial QA team reviews against the brief, the target rubric, formatting (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, IEEE, Vancouver), academic tone, and source quality.
• Pre-delivery check, final materials run through industry-standard originality screening and a senior mentor signs off before handover.
Only work that passes all three checks is delivered. We track every engagement's revision rate and grade outcome to keep mentors accountable.
02What if I am not satisfied with the deliverable?+
You get unlimited free revisions within 14 to 90 days of delivery, depending on the engagement tier (longer windows on Master and PhD tiers).
How to request a revision:
• Send the marker's feedback or your own notes through your engagement dashboard or email.
• The assigned mentor responds within 24 hours with a revision plan.
• Revisions are completed within the timeline you agree with the mentor.
If revisions cannot resolve the gap and the original brief was met on our side, the 3-tier outcome guarantee kicks in (see refund FAQ). If the deliverable falls short because the brief was not fully met, we revise free of charge until it is, no deadline restriction within the warranty window.
03How does the Scopus Q1/Q2 publishing advisory work?+
Scopus Q1/Q2 publishing advisory is MAAS's signature service for researchers, Master's, PhD candidates, and early-career academics aiming for top-quartile peer-reviewed journals. The advisory covers four stages:
• Journal selection, target journals matched to your manuscript scope, impact factor goals, and realistic acceptance odds.
• Structural review, alignment with the target journal's style, review criteria, and recent publication patterns. Includes IMRaD checks, methodology rigour, and contribution framing.
• Response-to-reviewer coaching, when reviewer comments arrive, mentors help you address each point without compromising your argument or methodological position.
• Submission strategy, timing, cover letter, suggested reviewers, ethics statement, and back-up journal sequencing if the first submission does not progress.
Mentors on this track all have first-author Scopus Q1 / Q2 publications themselves. This is not a generic editing service, engagements run 8–16 weeks for first submission and through the full revision cycle.