01How do you ensure the quality of every engagement?+
Quality is checked at three points, not one:
• Mentor selection — every mentor is screened against your specific brief before assignment. Not all mentors in the network are right for every engagement.
• In-cycle review — at each Outline → Draft → Final milestone, our Editorial QA team reviews against the brief, the target rubric, formatting (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, IEEE, Vancouver), academic tone, and source quality.
• Pre-delivery check — final materials run through Turnitin originality screening and a senior mentor signs off before handover.
Only work that passes all three checks is delivered. We track every engagement's revision rate and grade outcome to keep mentors accountable.
02What if I am not satisfied with the deliverable?+
You get unlimited free revisions within 14 to 90 days of delivery, depending on the engagement tier (longer windows on Master and PhD tiers).
How to request a revision:
• Send the marker's feedback or your own notes through your engagement dashboard or email.
• The assigned mentor responds within 24 hours with a revision plan.
• Revisions are completed within the timeline you agree with the mentor.
If revisions cannot resolve the gap and the original brief was met on our side, the 3-tier outcome guarantee kicks in (see refund FAQ). If the deliverable falls short because the brief was not fully met, we revise free of charge until it is — no deadline restriction within the warranty window.
03How does the Scopus Q1/Q2 publishing advisory work?+
Scopus Q1/Q2 publishing advisory is MAAS's signature service for researchers — Master's, PhD candidates, and early-career academics aiming for top-quartile peer-reviewed journals. The advisory covers four stages:
• Journal selection — target journals matched to your manuscript scope, impact factor goals, and realistic acceptance odds.
• Structural review — alignment with the target journal's style, review criteria, and recent publication patterns. Includes IMRaD checks, methodology rigour, and contribution framing.
• Response-to-reviewer coaching — when reviewer comments arrive, mentors help you address each point without compromising your argument or methodological position.
• Submission strategy — timing, cover letter, suggested reviewers, ethics statement, and back-up journal sequencing if the first submission does not progress.
Mentors on this track all have first-author Scopus Q1 / Q2 publications themselves. This is not a generic editing service — engagements run 8–16 weeks for first submission and through the full revision cycle.